Patenting intellectual property is common in nearly every industry, including gambling. Companies need patents to secure rights over their brand, protect designs (slot machines, roulette tables, casino game names), visual styles, or online platform features. However, there is a category of entities known as patent trolls who exploit patent rights not by creating products, but by monetizing legal claims. Read on to learn who they are and how they operate in gambling and betting.
Who Are Patent Trolls?
Patent trolls (also called non-practising entities, patent holding firms, or patent licensors) are individuals or companies that acquire patents but do not manufacture products or provide services based on them. Instead, they wait until other businesses are using the patented ideas or designs, then file lawsuits or demand licensing or royalty payments.
You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget. You don’t have to live forever, you just have to live. We do not remember days, we remember moments.
These patents might be on slot machine designs, betting features, early cash‐out options, or particular user interface elements. Sometimes trolls acquire patents early, then stay idle until the market demand for that technology increases, then strike.
This practice is harmful because it tends to stifle innovation, increase costs, and create legal uncertainty. Businesses might settle just to avoid expensive litigation, even if the patent claim is dubious.
Notable Examples in the Gambling Industry
- In 2019, Marketmaker Software Ltd. in Ireland claimed patents (from 2007) covering “early cash‐out” betting options. They targeted sportsbooks in New Jersey that offered features allowing bettors to exit a wager before the event ends.
- Another case was Beteiro LLC vs. DraftKings et al. where Beteiro claimed patents over remote gambling using geolocation. In 2024, U.S. courts invalidated or dismissed many of these claims, finding them over‐broad or insufficiently inventive under U.S. patent law.
- A more recent example: Zynga vs. IGT. IGT claimed that Zynga’s slot games infringed on patents allowing mobile games to continue operating despite communication interruptions. In Texas, a jury found IGT’s patent invalid.
Fresh at 2025: Recent Developments
Here are some updated trends and cases up to 2025:
- Courts are increasingly rejecting patents that are too abstract. For example, in Beteiro v. DraftKings, the U.S. Federal Circuit affirmed dismissal of patent infringement claims because the asserted patents were deemed to cover abstract ideas without specific technical implementation.
- Also, operators like online gambling companies have lost fights to protect “wager methods” that attempt to patent what are essentially business rules or algorithms without novel technical features.
- In mobile/gaming overlap, Skillz Inc. vs. AviaGames: Skillz was awarded nearly $42.9 million in damages after a jury found AviaGames infringed on a patent. This case shows that patent trolling threats are not just theoretical — they can lead to large settlements.
How Patent Trolling Works in Gambling & Betting
- Patent acquisition: Trolls obtain patents for technologies that may be broadly useful (user interface, early cash‐outs, geolocation betting, wager tracking, etc.).
- Waiting game: They wait until the technology becomes broadly adopted.
- Claim letters / demand letters: They threaten operators — often smaller ones first — with litigation unless a licensing fee is paid.
- Litigation or settlements: Lawsuits can be expensive even if the operator is confident they will win; many settle to avoid legal costs.
Legal Defenses and Trends
- Courts are using legal doctrines (e.g., in U.S. law, Alice/Mayo test, Section 101) to invalidate overly broad patents. If a patent just describes an abstract idea without technical innovation, it can be thrown out.
- Preemption: larger companies sometimes challenge patent validity via patent boards (e.g. PTAB in the U.S.) or through invalidation proceedings.
- Demonstrations of prior art are also key—showing that the claimed invention was already known or obvious.
- Negotiation and licensing: Some companies proactively license or redesign to avoid litigation.
Why It Matters in 2025
- As more gambling moves online, many platforms rely on digital features that may be patentable (UI design, UX flow, geolocation, cash-out, social features). Trolls can exploit these.
- The cost of litigation is rising. Even defending a claim can cost large operators millions, in legal fees and time.
- Regulatory scrutiny is increasing. Patent litigation also attracts attention from policymakers worried about barriers to innovation.
Read more: Finance affiliate programs UK